Most servers in RaW will have at least one Software RAID array for redundancy. Must be active md2 to can be mounted? It has been 2 days and I cannot detect any issues with the original fault. EDIT: Source Code ~# cat /proc/mdstat Personalities : [raid6] [raid5] [raid4] md126 : active (auto-read-only) raid5 sdb sdc sdg sdd 2930284032 blocks super 1.2 level 5, 512k chunk, algorithm 2 [4/4] http://culturahq.com/cannot-start/cannot-start-dirty-degraded-array-for-md2.html
Then... as documented in the /usr/linux/Documentation/md.txt (cwilkins post). If some are marked as removed or failed then you'll have to deal with the failed disks first. DEVICE partitions # auto-create devices with Debian standard permissions CREATE owner=root group=disk mode=0660 auto=yes # automatically tag new arrays as belonging to the local system HOMEHOST
md: pers->run() failed ... Edit: My /etc/mdadm/mdadm.conf looks like this. I'll calm down.
Ok, I'm a Linux software raid veteran and I have the scars to prove it (google for mddump if you're bored), but that's not doing me much good now. This morning I found that /dev/sdb1 had been kicked out of the array and there was the requisite screaming in /var/log/messages about failed read/writes, SMART errors, highly miffed SATA controllers, etc., Disclaimer: if it has one and if it is connected. Originally built with mdadm.
I powered off and now I don't see this raid in OMV and got error at Filesystems. I'll calm down. Adverb for "syntax" What are the applications of taking the output of an amp with a microphone? you could check here Last edited by HellesAngel; 10-11-2009 at 04:17 PM.
Needless to say the reboot resulted in some shock as one of the raid partitions (in my case 2.6TB MD3) was 'inactive'. All the tests are errors pretty much line up exactly. Teenage daughter refusing to go to school How to gain confidence with new "big" bike? I looked at the end of dmesg again for# dmesg | tail -18md: pers->run() failed ...raid5: device hdm4 operational as raid disk 0raid5: device hde2 operational as raid disk 6raid5: device
Seeing some md's recognised, seeing something about 2 out of 3 mirrors active. dig this Can't assemble degraded/dirty RAID6 array! dmesg says it has an invalid# dmesg | grep hdpide7: BM-DMA at 0xd808-0xd80f, BIOS settings: hdo:DMA, hdp:DMAhdp: WDC WD2500JB-00GVA0, ATA DISK drivehdp: max request size: 1024KiBhdp: 488397168 sectors (250059 MB) w/8192KiB Suse 10.2, updated regularly online.
The raid had 6 drives in it and then an ssd for bcache Hot Network Questions What is the total sum of the cardinalities of all subsets of a set? his comment is here Code: [[email protected] ~]# mdadm -D /dev/md0 /dev/md0: Version : 00.90.03 Creation Time : Tue Mar 21 11:14:56 2006 Raid Level : raid6 Array Size : 2344252416 (2235.65 GiB 2400.51 GB) Device It just sat there looking stupid. Converting the weight of a potato into a letter grade Wrong way on a bike path?
Ballpark salary equivalent today of "healthcare benefits" in the US? Anyone has ideas on this? I was unsuccessful, but perhaps someone here can adviseme where I went wrong.When I boot, I see the "Starting up RAID devices: ... * Tryingmd0... [ !!FAILED ]" and the system this contact form My hunch is that the problem stems from the superblock indicating that the bad device is simply "removed" rather than failed.
Anyway I followed the ideas presented here and was soon looking at the best bit of news possible: [email protected]:/home/andy# cat /proc/mdstat Personalities : [linear] [multipath] [raid0] [raid1] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4] [raid10] SATA cable. And what was: > Raid Level : raid5 > Device Size : 34700288 (33.09 GiB 35.53 GB) is now: Raid Level : raid5 Array Size : 138801152 (132.37 GiB 142.13 GB)
In Doctor Strange what was the title of the book Stan Lee was reading in his cameo? You may need to reboot to re-read your partition table. Try our newsletter Sign up for our newsletter and get our top new questions delivered to your inbox (see an example). So after that, I did the following: Code: umount /data Code: mdadm /dev/md0 -a /dev/sdb1 The drive was added without error.
Reason: Moved to a new thread HellesAngel View Public Profile View LQ Blog View Review Entries View HCL Entries Find More Posts by HellesAngel 02-16-2010, 11:31 PM #12 jonbers md: bind
I am hoping you guys could help me avoid this. When I did dmesg | tail , it said something about /dev/sda1 containing unsupported features. (Maybe a newer boot-cd will have a linux this features present?!) –nl-x Sep 11 '12 at share|improve this answer edited Nov 26 '12 at 22:03 amiregelz 4,64592745 answered Nov 26 '12 at 21:43 Vanderj68 211 add a comment| up vote 0 down vote md_d0 : inactive sda4(S) I have got to get this array back up today -- the natives are getting restless... -cw- Post 1: Ok, I'm a Linux software raid veteran and I have the scars
Ok... You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.